Usage 0.29.4

Released: 2026-07-26

Release notes

FEATURE

Steer an AI council as it talks, and see exactly who disagrees

Picture an AI council discussing a plan, then learning after round one that your single-host setup is being mistaken for a cluster. You no longer need to scrap the whole discussion. Turn on “guidance between rounds” and the session pauses before every later round, so you can add a correction such as “single host, no cluster.” A blank pause skips itself after five minutes, then the next round continues normally—like a chairperson’s bell that gets the meeting back on topic early. The consensus tally beneath the moderator’s summary now names each participant beside their position and colors dissenting or alternative views, so you need not hunt through the transcript. New to the five debate tones? Each picker option now has a plain-language hint: devil’s advocate deliberately argues the other side to test whether a plausible conclusion actually holds up, rather than merely being adversarial.

Original changelog

Original changelogSteer an AI council as it talks, and see exactly who disagrees
**Steer the council mid-discussion**: an opt-in "guidance between rounds" toggle pauses the session before every round after the first, so you can react to what you just heard — "we're single-host, no cluster" — instead of watching a debate run off in the wrong direction or stopping and restarting from scratch. The pause waits up to 5 minutes and is skipped automatically if left blank; the round then proceeds exactly as it did before.
**See who disagreed, not just how many**: the consensus tally under the moderator's summary now lists each participant by name next to their stance, with dissenting and alternative positions colored so they stand out, instead of a bare "2 agree, 1 alternative" that meant scrolling back through the transcript to find out who.
**The five debate tones now explain themselves**: a one-line plain-language hint appears under the tone picker — devil's advocate, for instance, now reads "the AIs will deliberately argue the opposite side to test whether a plausible conclusion holds up" — so a first-time user isn't left guessing how "adversarial" differs from "devil's advocate."