Usage 0.24.6

AI 人才市場裡的「程式碼審查員（code-reviewer）」角色現在變得更犀利了。透過更新上游（upstream，提供套件的源頭）的內容，這位助手現在內建了一張資安與邊界條件的檢查表，而且還懂得抓出「過度設計（over-engineering）」的毛病。這些新本領是直接整合到他原本的性格裡，並沒有另外拆成一堆重複的新角色來佔版面。這是一次純粹的內容擴充，系統程式碼沒有任何變動。就像你公司裡那位老經驗的品管稽核員，最近剛去上了最新的資安防護與精實管理課程，回來後還是同一個人坐在同一個位子上，但他現在抓錯的眼光比以前毒辣多了。

The "code-reviewer" assistant in the AI Talent Market has become much more rigorous. By rebuilding from upstream (the original source of these packages), this role is now equipped with a robust security and boundary-condition checklist, and it specifically knows how to flag "over-engineering" in your code. These new skills were smartly folded into the existing persona, rather than awkwardly splitting them out into overlapping new roles. This is purely a content update, with no underlying code changes. It's like your company's veteran QA inspector just attended an advanced cybersecurity and lean-management bootcamp—they returned to the same desk as the exact same person, but their eye for catching flaws is now a hundred times sharper.